Thursday, July 16, 2009

What is the change that Obama is talking about if he's elected president?

The USA is the best country in the world. I don%26#039;t think that we need a lot of change, especially Obama%26#039;s. He wants the country to become socialist with huge taxes for everybody who works and huge unemployment rate like the other socialist countries in the world.



What is the change that Obama is talking about if he%26#039;s elected president?





%26quot;Change%26quot; is the code name for a movement that capitalizes on the mob mentality and has little to do with any defined policy.



What is the change that Obama is talking about if he%26#039;s elected president? loan



Whatever is left of our dollars is the change after his taxing orgasms.|||Somehow the word change has come to mean 1970%26#039;s style socialism.



I must need a new dictionary.|||I think the big change he is talking about is lobbist affect on American legislature.|||Yes obama will change things!! obama will bring that change once he is elected. He will change the attitudes of Americans on how they look at the USA. He will change other countries views of the USA. I cannot wait for that change!!! Anybody against change, does not want change. I want change and cannot wait for obama to change things. Stand up for change! See how obama will change things!! only obama can bring this change!!!



Change is the motto...CHANGE!!! what change do you ask?? Um well...uuummm...sheees...I don%26#039;t know...neither does obama and his mindless supporters.|||I think it is talking like an adult, in whole sentences and paragraphs, listening to people%26#039;s opinions, and coming up with practical solutions to people%26#039;s problems. This is opposed to the Bush presidency, in which you talk like lying moron and are a tool of special interests to make yourself and your friends rich.|||His question was, what is the change Obama is talking about, and as usual. Obama supporters go off on these long rants , only one problem he has said himself. There is not much difference between him and Hillary. Yet he is somehow going to change the politics of Washington. That is the change he is talking about so a barely 2-year term senator. In his late 40s is going to change Washington, sure. Why not|||Next time you fill up you tank, Thank Republicans for their undying support of the war in Iraq for the price. Then, compare it to what your taxes would be plus Gas prices 8 years ago. So what it comes down to is.. You%26#039;d rather have a war, then help other people?



Obama would actually talk to our enemies. I believe that not talking to our enemies obviously does NOTHING. I am sure he would fix a lot of the anti-American sentiment that is all around the country. Have you ever been outside of this country? Have you ever talked to someone outside of this country? Almost everyone hates America because of the war in Iraq and Bush.



You are a republican, so you are fine with the way things are. You have had the lowest taxes in 8 years. You could care less about anything else as long as that stays the same. Most people are struggling to stay above water financially. Many people can barely afford health-care. And most people are tired of the same old politics that have done NOTHING for them. With McCain you will have another 8 years of the same exact same thing. And when your gas price reaches 6 dollars a gallon in 4 years. You will be PRAYING a democrat wins and increases the taxes of the upper class.|||What we need to change in America is to mandate IQ testing so that we dont allow brainless morans like you to vote|||He is just another politician that tells you what you want to hear. This country and world for that matter is run by money and the people that have it. Just by what has happened with his pastor and all the while telling Americans how he wants to bring us together just turns my stomach. This country doesn%26#039;t work by giving handouts to a bunch of blaming whiners. This country needs less government not the government we will end up with if he is elected. Nothing will get accomplished because the senate will be battling on every one of his socialist ideas. We need change but McCain, Clinton, and Obama sure is a poor choice. God Help Us not God Damn Us dumb whiteys for thinking this is some kind of savior. Absurd!!|||The USA is the best country in the world? really?! Because statistics show that we%26#039;re the most hated country in the world....



We don%26#039;t need change? Because were only a couple trillion dollars in dept right? And I mean we%26#039;ve only taken a couple million innocently lives....



....Please do me a favor, and go shoot yourself....immediately.|||we%26#039;ll get some change once our salaries have been heavily taxed.

Since the Economy is so Strong (LOL) Under Bush, Should We Continue the party with another Republica

Employers slashed 80,000 jobs in March



By JEANNINE AVERSA, AP Economics Writer 4 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - Employers nervous about diminishing business prospects slashed 80,000 jobs in March, the most in five years and the third straight month of losses.



At the same time, the national unemployment rate rose from 4.8 percent to 5.1 percent, the clearest signal yet that the economy may already be in a recession.



The new snapshot of the job market, released by the Labor Department Friday, underscored the damage that a trio of crises _in the housing, credit and financial sectors 鈥?has inflicted on companies, jobseekers and the economy as a whole.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080404/ap_o...



Structural problems, like the growing trade deficit with China and runaway price of oil, are further hampering prospects for growth. Unfortunately, the Administration%26#039;s responses to these problems have been tepid and encourage pessimism among business in the economic outlook.



Since the Economy is so Strong (LOL) Under Bush, Should We Continue the party with another Republican-McCain?





Little Tidbit for ya......



If the first two quarters of 2008 are considered a recession, (which they will) Bush will be the first president in the HISTORY of our country to have led the country during TWO recessions.



Quit a legacy don%26#039;t ya think.



Since the Economy is so Strong (LOL) Under Bush, Should We Continue the party with another Republican-McCain?

loan



Check the history.



Bush II is the only President ever to have two recessions during his terms. Only one ever to have TWO recessions while he was President. What was that he said about %26quot;fooling me once...%26quot;|||John McSame is going to be just that.



More of the same.



Unfortunately it%26#039;s been 43 white guys in a row.



That%26#039;s one hell of a coincidence!!|||Our economy was doing just fine until the Democrats got the Majority in congress and created gridlock because that is all Democrats know how to do.!~!|||Bush is a worse President in our history and Mc Cain is his clone. Obama will divide the races and men and women; and Hillary will be a turn-around President. John Edwards will heal our Nation.|||Well, the GOP is rife with evangelicals...



They%26#039;re probably jsut trying to speed along the rapture. Lulz.|||We%26#039;re starting to feel the impacts of the Nov 2006 elections.



Good job Dems!|||If you understand business, a economy goes through business cycles. We grew for 6 years, and now a decline.



Take the liberal appraoch to solving problems: raise taxes. Yeah, so when people are short on cash, you should go in and take more away from them.



These numbers are a disappointment, but remember that the average unemployement rate under the Clinton Administration was higher then 5.1%|||Bush ran the company into the ground|||Only if Hillary isn%26#039;t the other choice! then its save your butt boys the ship is going down|||Bush the Idiot president has screwed this great country so bad that we may not recover . We don%26#039;t need another war, spend, monger in office. The idiot bush has spent our grand children%26#039;s income and Mc Cain will spend more. The only thing sicker than the Idiot Bush is the idiots on here blaming the Democrats|||The economy is in very good shape, but there have been constant attempts to talk it down. Bush II has been like his father - a failure. He got a tax reduction through but only on the basis it had a sunset clause and this expectation of higher taxes is dampening the economy. Further, he has not got the oil out of the ground in Iraq and has been using the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as a price support for oil. Oil has gone from $11 a barrel to over $100 a barrel. Needless to say, Texas is booming. Bush stood idly by and let domestic spending get completely out of control. Once Bush goes, the oil price will come down and the economy will boom, provided we do not get another tax and spend President.

Should Iraq be Spending Their $60 Billion Dollar Budget Surplus Instead of American Treasure?

Iraq currently has a $60 Billion dollar surplus in THEIR budget. Should they be spending their surplus instead of relying 100% on American funds to fund their intiatives including construction problems?



Couldn%26#039;t we %26#039;better%26#039; use our troops in Afganastan and other %26#039;hot%26#039; spots and our treasure on American problems?



Iraq has a 40% Unemployment rate - should they use their %26#039;surplus%26#039; population to defend themselves rather than depending on US Troops to %26#039;watch dog%26#039; them?



Should Iraq be Spending Their $60 Billion Dollar Budget Surplus Instead of American Treasure?





yes they should . and the Iraq government need to start paying back the billions this country have spent on them maybe beef up they%26#039;re oil production to the USA



Should Iraq be Spending Their $60 Billion Dollar Budget Surplus Instead of American Treasure? loan



they probably just want to mooch of off the US for as long as possbile... get as much money as you can...|||No, they should stay unemployed so that gasoline can be high and George Pubic Bush%26#039;s friends can scoop the loot.|||Where did the expression %26quot;treasure%26quot; come from? I hear it on the news, and everybody repeats what the news says verbatim. If I hear %26quot;boots on the ground%26quot; one more time, I%26#039;m gonna lose it. Think for yourself sometimes.

Is the media trying to fake a recession?

I keep hearing strangely worded headlines especially on the Yahoo! home page. The first one was %26quot;Largest Financial Overhaul Since the Great Depression%26quot; The next one today .. up now is %26quot;Unemployment rate highest in two years%26quot;



These articles just seem kinda mediocre and bogus.



Is the media trying to fake a recession?





Just read a report by an independent study group that said economic news is reported differently depending on the party in power. If a democrat is in the White House the media says the future is bright......things are getting better...... BUT if a Republican is in the White House.... the EXACT SAME conditions are reported as economic doom.... we are about to suffer tragic recession / depression



This is the second independent study in six months to statistically verify the liberal bias of the media



Sadly often these %26quot;predictions%26quot; are self fullfilling prophesies.....the media creates the recession or boom by what they report......instead of reporting it they make it happen



Is the media trying to fake a recession?

loan



Duh we are in a recession and have been for the past year.|||If you can not see that a serious recession is looming, it is time to take off those rose colored glasses.



All the indicators point towards one, and it is not too far off.|||It%26#039;s quite obvious that the MSM is working to convince people that we are already in a recession, even though we have not even had 1 quarter of negative growth. It takes 2 consecutive quarters to make a recession. This seems to be tied into the whole Presidential campaign as it give lots of ammo to the LibDems Clinton and Obama against the %26quot;evil%26quot; Republicans.....and people deny that the MSM (CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN) is very left leaning, and attempting to further the Liberal agenda.|||You know what - I TOTALLY AGREE!



The same is happening here in the UK. I%26#039;m not denying that our economy is not at its healthiest, but by no means are we facing a financial meltdown. Everyday I hear the same thing - that I have been hearing since 2002, that there will be a recession in the future according to prominent economists at the city. Luckily I ignored it then, and today I%26#039;ll do the same. I was stuck and decided to buy a house, and my dad kept telling me not to because apparently %26#039;the house prices are gonna fall%26#039; but what happened - 6 years on and thier still growing and last year i brought another house.



Sometimes it makes me laugh, because the recession always seems to be %26#039;tomorrow%26#039;, and then when it doesn%26#039;t come, its like - %26#039;oh, hold on, one more day it%26#039;ll come!%26#039;.



Some people say DOOMSDAY will come %26#039;tomorrow%26#039; aswell, but its always tomorrow. I%26#039;m fed up and don%26#039;t bother absorbing this crap, and I%26#039;m glad you asked such a good question, because i thought I was the only one who thought like this.|||Maybe where you live you don%26#039;t see it. I do. In my town all kinds of businesses are closing down and people are losing their jobs left and right. Also, the price of food, gas and utilities is getting way out of control and people are having a hard time affording those things. I guess some towns are richer than others.

How can we get food-aid to starving people in Haiti?

In a country where most people live on less than $2 per day, with an unemployment rate in excess of 70%, in a good year, 1 in 5 babies born in Haiti die. Recently, because of the economic instability in our area of the world, food prices in Haiti have more than doubled. There are riots in the streets as I write this because people just don%26#039;t have money to buy food.



What can we do to help? There are international organizations that help starving people in Africa. What can I do to bring attention to the fact that hungry, dying people need food aid? Who can I contact? If you have ANY information to help me help these people, please, please, share with me.



How can we get food-aid to starving people in Haiti?





Jv I appreciate your interest in helping my country however you might be the last person who can help us.What comes next when you finish giving the food you are talking about? In Haiti we need jobs, education for our youth so we can make our own food. If you feed us today, who is going to do it tomorrow? Like Sophie said, let us learn to fish so we can get our fish whenever the need comes.



if you really want to help Haiti, ask your government and the WTO to allow the government to reopen the market that the Haitians government used to subsidize. Tell your media to stop lying about Haiti and to stop trashing the country so Foreign entrepreneur can come and invest there so we can have jobs like the telephone company DIGICEL did. Tell the UN to take the useless force keepers out of Haiti and use the money that they are paying their rapist tourist soldiers to create jobs. Tell the imperialist countries to lift their secret embargo on Haiti. No foreigners can help Haiti. It is the local government that needs the guts to stand against the imperialist countries that have been oppressing Haiti from the colonial period till today. Tell them to stop giving coup d鈥檈tat to democratic governments that try to help the poor. You have no right to tell that Haiti is abusing human right giving that your country expelled an elected government 4 years ago. You are the wrong person to talk about democracy. Go check in history and see which government supported the illegal junta that led Haiti in 1994. Albert fish can you please tell me who made me starve in 1993-92 because of an imperialist embargo?The international world, put an embargo on the country because the authority were criminal soldiers but the same people who put the embargo were backing up these soldiers with oil while the population was starving. Yes you foreigner are feed criminals and let innocent people die. Ask who started to mess up the structure of the Haitian government from 1915 till today. I am sorry but we do not trust foreigners in Haiti because they took too much away from us. By the way, tell your people to stop sending guns to Haiti. Oh did you know that they also trained the rebels who kick Aristide out in 2004? Did you know that they also train the militaries who did the coup in 1994?Talking about human right, did you know that Emanuel Constant, a Haitian criminal , who was in the macoute with papa doc, raped, stole, kill people in Haiti but now he is peacefuly living in the US? Did you know that some US officials came to arrest Guy Philipe,a Haitian rebel/for mer soldier because he is accused of drug dealing while nothing has been done to try the assasin whose name is Constant



I would like to tell Sophie that when the Haitian cut down the trees it was not because they did not want reforestation but because they had no resources. In a country where a bonbonn of gaz cost more than two month salary for some people do you expect them to use something else than charcoal? As you said you cannot keep feeding someone with fish, you need to teach them how to catch the fish themselves. The international organizations, whether you call them donor or NGO, never helped Haiti. When they say that they give $20 000 to the country, the money goes to corrupted politician supported by those international donors. When they say that they are building a road in Haiti which have not happen for years, they hire workers and engineer from other countries to do the job. So how can you say that you help local people? If they had used this money to instruct local engineer and other intellectual, they would not have to hire foreigners. Alber fish, you should go back to school because you are a plain ignorant. People are dying of hunger not because the planet is overpopulated but because there is a disparity in the distribution of the resources in the world. Of course we have scarcity but when you see how much cr@p you waste in the US and other developed countries, you have the proof that they could go and be used somewhere else. Why do some people have 5 tv in their home while others can鈥檛 afford one? Is it because there are to many people asking for tv or because some people have more than they need? You said Haitians are need for you but it was not a Haitian who came to beg for help here. It was a foreigner who asked the question and screw you @$$ hole. We are not useful anymore after you sucked the $h!t out of us. Now it鈥檚 Afghanistan and Irak that are useful right? I bet that you will say the same thing about Afg.. and Irak in 20 years when you



finish sucking their ressources



How can we get food-aid to starving people in Haiti?

loan



CARE The Red Cross|||If I remember correctly... Haiti was the country that denuded itself of hardwood forests to make charcoal.. and then when international foundations came in too stop the erosion by planting new trees, they cut the saplings to make charcoal also.......



You can feed a man a fish for a day or teach him to fish for a lifetime.....|||The planet is overpopulated anyway. Why help more humans survive? Hatians barely participate in the global economy and don%26#039;t develop new technologies or make scientific discoveries, so they%26#039;re of no use to us.|||My church sent a bag of Rice to Haiti. It was a big bag.|||Many churches run schools and missions in Haiti. I go to a Lutheran church that sponsors one, but pretty much any of the major churches will have more info, depending on your preferences.|||The problem is not whether we can support it or not but making sure that that the support doesn%26#039;t fall in the wrong hand.



How do we know that our support are not ending up in market like in North Korea?|||It is a problem in most poor countries. Well they aren%26#039;t really poor the ones in power aren%26#039;t! You can lead a horse to water but you can%26#039;t make them drink.



We have so many children that are starving in our own country and that is where we need to solve the problem first.



Laziness and lack of education that%26#039;s what it boils down to.



I have seen so many people here in the US living off the government cause it%26#039;s easier. Or in some cases better way of life for most. A person on welfare gets as much cash and food stamps as a person working a min. wage job. To top this off they get a medical card that covers all cost. Now the person that is out there trying to work and support their families on a min wage job can%26#039;t afford medical for their family. And Lord help them if they get sick and can%26#039;t go into work that day for they cannot afford to go to the doctor and they lose a days pay! So you tell me what is our government telling these people? The fact is we need to take care of our problems first and when we come up with a solution maybe then we are more capable to help others in need. Don%26#039;t get me wrong I am as giving a person as the next. I feel and I cry and I hurt for those poor people in all the countries that the government lines their pockets with cash and their people with poverty and sickness.

Binomial: Advanced?

The unemployment rate in a city is 13%. Find the probability that at least 2 out of 10 people from this city sampled at random are unemployed. Round your answer to four decimal places.



Binomial: Advanced?





Let X be the number of unemployed sampled. X has the binomial distribution with n = 10 trials and success probability p = 0.13



In general, if X has the binomial distribution with n trials and a success probability of p then



P[X = x] = n!/(x!(n-x)!) * p^x * (1-p)^(n-x)



for values of x = 0, 1, 2, ..., n



P[X = x] = 0 for any other value of x.



The probability mass function is derived by looking at the number of combination of x objects chosen from n objects and then a total of x success and n - x failures.



Or, in other words, the binomial is the sum of n independent and identically distributed Bernoulli trials.



X ~ Binomial( n , p )



the mean of the binomial distribution is n * p = 1.3



the variance of the binomial distribution is n * p * (1 - p) = 1.131



the standard deviation is the square root of the variance = √ ( n * p * (1 - p)) = 1.063485



The Probability Mass Function, PMF,



f(X) = P(X = x) is:



P( X = 0 ) = 0.2484234



P( X = 1 ) = 0.3712074



P( X = 2 ) = 0.249605



P( X = 3 ) = 0.09945945



P( X = 4 ) = 0.02600808



P( X = 5 ) = 0.004663517



P( X = 6 ) = 0.0005807061



P( X = 7 ) = 4.95841e-05



P( X = 8 ) = 2.778420e-06



P( X = 9 ) = 9.225914e-08



P( X = 10 ) = 1.378585e-09



The Cumulative Distribution Function, CDF,



F(X) = P(X ≤ x) is:



x



∑ P(X = t) =



t = 0



P( X ≤ 0 ) = 0.2484234



P( X ≤ 1 ) = 0.6196308



P( X ≤ 2 ) = 0.8692358



P( X ≤ 3 ) = 0.9686952



P( X ≤ 4 ) = 0.9947033



P( X ≤ 5 ) = 0.9993668



P( X ≤ 6 ) = 0.9999475



P( X ≤ 7 ) = 0.9999971



P( X ≤ 8 ) ≈ 1



P( X ≤ 9 ) ≈ 1



P( X ≤ 10 ) = 1



1 - F(X) is:



n



∑ P(X = t) =



t = x



P( X ≥ 0 ) = 1



P( X ≥ 1 ) = 0.7515766



P( X ≥ 2 ) = 0.3803692 ← answer = 1 - P(X = 1) - P(X = 0)



P( X ≥ 3 ) = 0.1307642



P( X ≥ 4 ) = 0.03130475



P( X ≥ 5 ) = 0.005296679



P( X ≥ 6 ) = 0.0006331623



P( X ≥ 7 ) = 5.245616e-05



P( X ≥ 8 ) = 2.872057e-06



P( X ≥ 9 ) = 9.363773e-08



P( X ≥ 10 ) = 1.378584e-09



Binomial: Advanced?

loan



The negation of the at least 2 out of 10 people are unemployed is less than two people are unemployed.



Using: 1 - P(A%26#039;) = P(A), you can use this relationship to find your answer.



To find the probability that less than 2 people are unemployed(i.e. 9 or more are employed), you only need to do two combinations.



P(A%26#039;) = (10 C 1)(.87^9)(0.13^1) + (10 C 0)(0.87^10)(0.13^0) ~= 0.6196



Your answer should be:



1 - P(A%26#039;)



1 - P(A%26#039;) = 0.3804

Life of people who have been fired or laid off work? 10 points for the best advice.Thank you?

Isn%26#039;t it sad. We are facing 5.1 unemployment rate. Many jobs are laid off people.



What do you think? Thank you.



Life of people who have been fired or laid off work? 10 points for the best advice.Thank you?





I work in technology and have been laid off several times in the last 10 years. It is something that I survive. Growing up, my father was a union steelworker, and periodically the union would strike; I learned to have a cushion to survive. My church (LDS) teaches things like having low debt and keeping food storage to get through bad times; by doing this, people are less tempted to do wrong just to survive.



In 2001, the company I worked for went bankrupt, and I did not get $1100 in expenses or my last month of salary. On April 1st, I finally got the $1100 and am waiting for the IRS to calculate withholding so I will get the month%26#039;s salary. It was such a surprise!



I work for a large company; about 40% of the people in our group of 250 are Asian or Indian here on visas. I have been told I can%26#039;t get promoted because the job has to go to an Indian male who is being presented as having a unique skill set so the company can spend $25,000 on his becoming a citizen. In the meantime, I have 25 years of experience and am underpaid and have to watch this guy do very little actual work. I feel this is extremely wrong when there are Americans out of work, to bring people in to do jobs for which skill sets exist here.



My advice: Only buy a house you can afford on one paycheck, even if you are a two income house. Keep debt low; stock up on food before you are laid off. Try to keep a cushion of at least a month to three months in the bank. If you are laid off, do something everyday for job hunting to keep your name out there. Always be nice to receptionists and janitors; you never know when you will need a good word to get a job and everyone deserves respect. Take immediate stock of what expenses you can cut and do so. Involve the kids and let them know what sacrifices everyone will make. Be a lifetime learner; know what is going on in your industry and what skills you need to develop to get a different job if one arises. And, don%26#039;t try to be the last one standing for layoffs; often you will get a worse severance package and others have had time to snap up the other jobs. Don%26#039;t put all of your 401k in company stock; if the company goes belly up, you will lose your investment that could help see you through bad times.



Life of people who have been fired or laid off work? 10 points for the best advice.Thank you?

loan



It has been lots worse than this



10% unemployment and 16 % interest rates under jimmy carter in the late 70%26#039;s



If you want to see tough times go to Detroit right now|||I was laid off in January. I JUST got a job offer this past Friday (4/4/08). I had been actively looking for work... I really had no savings because at the end of the year I took my savings and paid it towards my debt. My severance package was 2 weeks pay... hardly enough to even be classified as a %26quot;package%26quot;. Fortunately I don%26#039;t have any dependents and I was able to get some help from family and friends. I did use that time to make a career change... I was in banking, and have decided to go back to retail management. I couldn%26#039;t be happier with my decision.|||It is sad but more importantly it is hard. Especially when both spouses get laid off and are unable to find something with the same amount of pay or even less. I know because this happend to my husband and myself. Our children are the ones who suffer for it. Extra things had to be canceled, bank accounts went for food and lightbill, car payment, ins. etc. With little to no help from the state and prices rising it is like living your worst nightmare. Having to tell your kids you are unable to buy them a particular pair of shoes or clothing because the price is just not within budget at the time tears a parent%26#039;s heart right out. We live in one of the poorest section of this country and to be honest it is just plain depressing. We work hard to give our children what they need. To be deprived of that is something I doubt we will ever be over, even with our kids telling us they understand. No one should have to deal with that! Employers should look at what exactly is at stake before laying off. Firing well there should be a really good reason.|||There are certain sectors that are flourishing. Health Care, Education, and Technology are three good examples. The point here is that to be successful in these industries you need education. I believe the US is becoming overshadowed by an evolving global economy.



Also the lowest rates of unemployment are in the south and west. Basically urban centers that arent tied to manufacturing. Seattle and Texas cities have the lowest unemployment.



From what I have read (wall street journal) Bernanke (fed chairman) says that the US economy will experience the worst part of this recession in the 3rd quarter of this year and a revival at the end of the year. I think that is extremely optimistic. Think about changing industries. Stay away from cities that are tied to manufacturing. Research the unemployment in certain areas and, if your willing to change, move.|||You should go look at the unemployment rates monthly since WW ll.



They average alot higher than 5.1%|||Employers have for years used the unemployment stats to their advantage. They blame lay offs on the economy and turn over employees so they reduce wages. This turn over means lower insurance, wages, benefits, higher productivity and they don%26#039;t have to concern themselves with pension plans.



You have to be versatile in the market. That%26#039;s why education is so important.

Hypothetical Employment Question?

ABC just announced the unemployment rate of California this past Sept. Was 4.5% with 20 million people in the labor force. But they fail to give the actual number unemployed what is it?



Hypothetical Employment Question?





i%26#039;m not sure, but you must also consider that %26#039;unemployment rates%26#039; measure those who are recieving unemployment benefits; it does not take into account those that have been umemployed so long that they can no longer get the benefits, or those that were never eligible to recieve them, ONLY the ones CURRENTLY receiving unemployment benefits.



(if i was right as to how they use the numbers, 4.5% would be about 940,000 people.... but i could be wrong)



Hypothetical Employment Question?

loan



The answer is 4.5% of 20 million. That%26#039;s the definition of %26quot;unemployment rate%26quot; -- the percentage of the labor force who are unemployed.



And, to the previous response, calculation of unemployment rate has NOTHING to do with whether people are receiving benefits.

What needs 2 happen in America to prepare the workforce for the changing world, so that we do not fa

The American workforce is facing a changing world. American jobs are being outsourced to other countries and jobs are being lost in America.



September 2007, the U.S. Department of Labor reported that the unemployment rate was 4.6 and -4000 was added.



I beleive many Americans want American jobs to stay in America, and make jobs availiable to Americans citizens.



Globalization is great. Today, we now live in a borderless business environment, but if companies are sending jobs to other countries and the American general workforce will not benefit from this business model, who wins? Certainly not American workers, because we can not get a good paying job.



Again, what do we need to do as a country, to better prepare American workers, so we do not fall behind other countries with regard to jobs and a quality workforce?



What needs 2 happen in America to prepare the workforce for the changing world, so that we do not fall behind?





In the last 25 years,our manufacturing base has been cut in half.Too late to cry about it now.Best course for the young and talented is to acquire skills that have a global marketability.Rest of America will need to learn how to get by with less while buying foreign made junk at Wally World.



What needs 2 happen in America to prepare the workforce for the changing world, so that we do not fall behind? loan



Question comes too late.|||On the low end spectrum, if America wants to compete with foreign cheap labor, they%26#039;re going to have to work for low wages and for fewer benefits. Their is no way around this; you have to compete with what%26#039;s available and the most desperate people will work for whatever they can. Even on the high end field this is true. I%26#039;m a computer programmer, my field used to enjoy incredibly lucrative salaries. Not so much anymore, Indian programmers will do the same quality of work for about $10-$20 / hour. Gone are the days when a programmer could easily be making 6 figures several years out of college.



One way America could increase its manufacturing economy is by signing off on some type of amnesty or guest worker program. This would increase company%26#039;s incentives to operate within America (and pay taxes to our government).

What country is this?

The main language of this country is over 50% derived from Latin



While still relatively low, the unemployment rate in this country is over 11%



This country鈥檚 head of state is technically a monarch, but he/she holds little actual power



One of the official monetary units is the Euro



The major industries include machinery, chemicals, electronics, food, textiles, and metallurgy



What country is this?





I will go with Spain, although it can be either one.



What country is this? loan



Spain or England|||Most likely to be Spain - definitely not UK - no Euro, unemployment at 4.7%|||I think its spain but im not sure.|||its spain|||It isn%26#039;t England, as Britain doesn%26#039;t use the Euro.



It isn%26#039;t France, because France certainly doesn%26#039;t have a monarch, figurehead or not (the French Revolution took care of that one).



Italian and Spanish are romance languages derived from Latin, but Greek is not, so that rules out Greece.



According to Wikipedia, Spain is officialy the Kingdom of Spain organized as a parliamentary monarchy, which means the head of state is a monarch with little actual power.



I%26#039;m going to go with Spain on this one, as I%26#039;m pretty sure Italy doesn%26#039;t have a monarch.|||Let%26#039;s eliminate the obvious:



Germany and France and Italy have no monarch.



Greek is not derived from Latin.



We%26#039;re left with England and Spain. Both have a monarchy. I would doubt that the English language is 50% derived from Latin, however. The unemployment statistic doesn%26#039;t match up with what is found online, but Spain has a higher unemployment rate than England. Doing a search on Spain major industries came up with more or less the list you provided.



So, I%26#039;d say Spain.|||spanish derived from latin



Spain has a monarch



france has no monarch



england doesn%26#039;t use the euro



germany is a germanic language, i don%26#039;t think it derived from latin.



so i have to say, it is spain

Does LIFE seem pretty GREAT right NOW?

Our economy has now added jobs for 50 straight months 鈥?the longest period of uninterrupted job growth on record. The unemployment rate remains VERY VERY low at 4.7 percent.



http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/02/busine...



Bush%26#039;s Surge is Working



http://news.independent.co.uk/world/midd...



Military is Meeting it%26#039;s Recruitment Goals



http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071113/ts_...



No Terror Attack on USA soil since 9/11



Honor %26amp; Dignity back in the White House



These are the salad days!



Does LIFE seem pretty GREAT right NOW?





Is THAT the party line that the White House is distributing to Faux News??? Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!



Does LIFE seem pretty GREAT right NOW? loan



and no sightings of Lurch Kerry anywhere...|||Yes, I am very pleased with the state of the union|||I will drink to that.|||I agree.



And, life is what individuals make for themselves, not what the govt. does for them|||Life is never as bad as the left makes it out to be.|||Life has been great for me for the past 7 years.



Much better than at any point under Clinton.|||woo hoo!



Lets all cheer the employment in Big Government growing, and violence being pushed from baghdad to other areas of the country!!



And really cheer the fact that the military has finally met recruitment goals for a month!



cheer cheer!!|||How right you are, but there%26#039;s always the %26quot;yeah, but things could be better%26quot; crowd who don%26#039;t like to admit it. If you list 100 things that we should be thankful for someone will reply with, %26quot;some children go to bed hungry%26quot;, %26quot;some old people can%26#039;t live off social security%26quot;, %26quot;not everyone has adequate healthcare insurance%26quot;, %26quot;so %26amp; so group is still victimized by the rich%26quot;, and on and on. There%26#039;s no utopia this side of heaven.



Brian 241 - Honor %26amp; dignity restored in the White House??



BJs in the Oval Office and theft of furniture? Rooms for rent? Uh huh...|||You betcha. The future%26#039;s so bright,I gotta wear shades (see my cool,little bug shades).|||Life%26#039;s a Beach!!|||NO it doesn%26#039;t:



eNews References:



Jim Lehrer News Hour Interview (Full Text):



http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/white_hou...



CBS News Dan Rather Interview (Video):



http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/06/0...



Fox News Chris Wallace Interview (Video):



http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/24/clin...



eNewsReference.com:



http://www.enewsreference.com/enr/hillar...



http://www.enewsreference.com/enr/rudolp...



http://www.enewsreference.com/barack_oba...|||It%26#039;ll get even better when honor and dignity in the White House is restored when one of the Democrats replace Bush in 2009.|||Loving it. Got the tiger by the tail.|||YES!!!!! Definetly!!!!!



We are what we make of ourselves. If we want to be whining doom and gloomers looking for a cloud around the silver lining then we will be liberals and vote democrat on the other hand........|||AND Hillary continues her downward spiral. She%26#039;ll lose Iowa.|||Are you a paid propagandist or is it just a hobby? I %26#039;d say you%26#039;re being paid, because no rational person could actually believe the part about dignity being restored to the White House.|||The greenback is falling like a rock.



China now owns the USA.



America%26#039;s international profile is at an all-time low.



There are 20 million illegals living in the US... and that number is rapidly rising.



American civil liberties are still eroded and will remain so for the foreseeable future.



America remains one of the most violent, racist and politically divided nations on Earth.



etc.



Yup... %26quot;pretty great%26quot;!|||You bet your sweet bippie! The only thing i pay for is a driver%26#039;s license and $18 a month for gas for my 1956 Cushman %26quot;Eagle%26quot; motor scooter. With a Briggs %26amp; Straton 5 hp engine.



I live on a 67ft. Catamaran. Twin 27hp. diesel engines. twin 5kw diesel generators, Both run on biofuel. Which I process myself. [it%26#039;s free from restraurants]. I%26#039;m anchored off of Key West,Fla. I fish off of my boat. Grow vegatables on an island 75 ft. away with some other prepared boaters. Money in the bank. Work my own hours.



Yes...life is good no matter,what the economy does.|||The Democrats elected to Congress in 2006 have not had enough time to screw anything up except the price of Gasoline and the value of the dollar.



Wait until next year.|||It%26#039;s a great time to buy a house.|||Thanks for the update.|||It%26#039;s sure is a bountiful time...depending on who you ask though (If you%26#039;re Halliburton, Big Oil or Blackwater I%26#039;d say %26quot;Yes%26quot;).



Not sure it%26#039;s been all that great to those whose homes are in foreclosure, up 94% from last year.



http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/29/real_est...



Or the families of troops killed as 2007 became the deadliest year for U.S. troops in Iraq.



http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/11/0...



Or the 25% of Vets that come back home and are homeless:



http://cbs3.com/local/Homeless.Veterans....



As far as NOT getting attacked. That%26#039;s the President%26#039;s job, should I give him a cookie for doing his job? Should I therefore be upset that we WERE attacked while he led us?



Honor and Dignity back in the White house? Those words might be too big for you, I suggest you look them up.|||At whose expense?



100%26#039;s of millions of your fellow human beings are suffering in part because of American greed and the involvement of the Elite to lord over the less fortunate!



Sorry if this isn%26#039;t the answer you were looking for but your rose colored glasses need to be recalibrated to 20/20!



And how do you consider a President and an administration that is more suspected of corruption than any other before them honorable and diginified?

Is immigration bad for the U.S.?

Copyright The Filipino Express Apr 3-Apr 9, 2006



[Headnote]



EDITORIAL



ACROSS America, there is still a lingering resentment and fear of immigrants. Much of these sentiments can actually be traced to long-standing myths about immigrants and their negative impact on the US economy.



The most pervading misconception about immigrants is that they are a drain on the economy. On the contrary, immigrants actually contribute a lot to the nation%26#039;s economy, which, according to the National Research Council (NRC), could be as high as $10 billion per year.



The average immigrant actually pays $1,800 more in taxes than the cost of the public benefits, such as health care and education, that he or she receives. A study by the University of Florida in 2001 showed that the average immigrant actually paid 25 percent more taxes than do a citizen: $5,485, compared to $4,180.



Undocumented immigrants are actually subsidizing the US social security. The Social Security Administration has an Economic Suspense File - contributions that cannot be matched to workers%26#039; names and social security numbers - that had accumulated $463 billion as of 2002. This is due largely to undocumented immigrants who pay their dues but cannot claim benefits.



Another erroneous belief about immigrants is that they are stealing away jobs from Americans. The reality is that the American workforce is aging and the population is not growing fast enough to fill the jobs. From 2002 to 2012, the number of Americans 55 years and over is projected to increase by nearly 50 percent; those aged 25 to 54 will rise by only 5.1 percent.



Without the infusion of immigrants into the labor force, many industries would not have enough manpower to sustain their operations. A labor shortage could force companies to shut down, which in turn could adversely affect the US economy.



If indeed foreign workers are crowding out Americans for jobs, then the number of out-of-work Americans ought to be high. But the Pew Hispanic Center reported in late March that even though undocumented immigrants hold about seven million jobs, the US unemployment rate was at a low 5.4 percent.



Unfortunately, lawmakers in both Houses of Congress hostile to immigration have done an excellent job of perpetuating the myths and obscuring the realities about-immigrants in the United States.



Is immigration bad for the U.S.?





NO THEY DO MORE GOOD THAN HARM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



VIVA MEXICO Y LA RAZA MEXICANA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Is immigration bad for the U.S.?

loan



immigration is not bad for the u.s., people have the right to live wherever they want to live, immigration was unlimited before the early 1900%26#039;s a large amount of europeans immigrated to the united states from europe, new immigrants enter this country every single day, anybody is welcome to the u.s. no matter what race they are|||not mexicans. but asians? YES.|||I call B.S..........I live around them and I know better.....Political propaganda because big business is making money from there low wages and guess what.....big business runs the USA........lobbyist anyone???



The rich are getting richer and the poor have no jobs because illegals are working for 1/2 price and living 2-3 families per household here........there goes the american dream..............|||Illegal or legal? Ya know what either way we have too many so yeah enough immigrants already! Can we be citizens in any other country that we chose? No! There is a reason why! The country wants to preserve what they have already and why should we be any different!|||You need to stop believing the liberal lie. Very few are against IMMIGRATION. The HUGE MAJORITY are against ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!



Now to answer your question:



Is immigration bad for the US? Not unless unchecked.



Is ILLEGAL immigration bad for the US? ABSOLUTELY!!! NO QUESTION ABOUT IT!!|||Immigration is good. Illegal immigration is bad. Check back with me when your reading comprehension advances to the level where you understand the difference between immigrating legally and sneaking across the border.|||no; not at all, only illegal immigration is bad for us because it we pay for it not them, and all the jobs they claim to fill were once filled by Americans or legal immigrants and when you speak on an aging American work force that would only be in the professional market not the labor market this country has more than enough laborers to do the job with-out them being illegally here. in-fact we offer incentives to professionals to come here legally because we are looking for skilled professionals. really anyone can pick fruits and vegetables, flip burgers and cut lawns and before the influx of illegals there were Americans and legals who did the job just fine. believe me no-one here is against immigration; just the illegal type.|||There is a difference between legal immigration and illegal aliens coming into a country.....legal immigrates pay their own way..illegal aliens ..well, you take a look at these numbers and decide..... http://www.immigrationcounters.com/ by the way, the money being wired out does not go back into the economy...so, you have to look at this as a loss.....|||Meanwhile wages in the middle class and lower-middle class are stagnant. The only ones growing currently are in the upper range ie the top 20%. Would this have anything to do with a mass influx of labor?



Makes one wonder why the 50%26#039;s were described as a tight labor market with ever increasing wages. But government dependency is not an issue, is it? Illegals don%26#039;t take as much as their children....ohh....



Do you literally think that in places like Calfornia where they%26#039;re suggested to spend upwards of 8k-11k per child in education...that illegal immigrants are contributing enough!? That must be some good propaganda crack...because there%26#039;s no chance of that.



Most of our schools are primarily funded by property tax and then state income...not federal income. An average illegal immigrant is not going to afford the house which pays that sort of money in yearly taxes, nor is he going to contribute that much in state income. Any assertion to that, is an outright lie.



Perhaps you should post your links to your stories....|||Everything has it%26#039;s good and bad. People will say it%26#039;s bad, it really depends on how good it is. Immigration is great (good) for us, but we do need to fix the things that are not good about it.



So, immigration is not bad for the US.

If Republicans are all for "small government", what's with the "War on Drugs&quo

...Who is the government to come in and say that a PLANT is illegal and you are a criminal for growing it and a criminal for what you choose to put in your own body?



Who is the government to build massive amounts of jails and a criminal justice beurocracy just to house political %26quot;criminals%26quot; ie NON violent drug offenders (50% of jail population),



diverting the police and investigators attention away from REAL criminals, like murderers, child molesters and rapists?



And filling our court houses with BS red tape?



Is this all to create government jobs



and kill two birds with one stone, the poor are sedated and have drugs to sell, and when caught, are housed in jails keeping the unemployment rate low while creating more jobs for government workers?



If Republicans are all for %26quot;small government%26quot;, what%26#039;s with the %26quot;War on Drugs%26quot;?





I think you are confusing several distinctly separate issues and are attempting to tie them all together into one neat little package.



First, who is the government? It is %26quot;We The People...%26quot; You may have been too zoned out in your governments class to catch the part about the basis of all civilizations being built upon governing laws designed to protect. You don%26#039;t strike me as the type to REALLY study the chemical composition of the various %26quot;plants to which you refer, their effects on the cell structure as well as the residule effects. Perhaps you should.



Your spelling (%26quot;beurocracy%26quot;) is even worse than mine! You were sitting in the back of the class? Or, you simply didn%26#039;t see a need to make it that day...



Here%26#039;s a thought for you: The poor are poor because of bad life decisions -- repeated decisions. You honestly think getting blasted out of one%26#039;s mind is going to help them make better decisions? They have little to no money, so you condone the idea of them spending what little they do not have on %26quot;recreation%26quot; such as Ipods, cell phones, beer, cigarettes and %26quot;plants?%26quot; I thought that was what cable TV was for!!! Personally, I%26#039;m tired of my tax dollars being wasted on this class of people and those who would condone the advocacy of such %26quot;lifestyles.%26quot;



If Republicans are all for %26quot;small government%26quot;, what%26#039;s with the %26quot;War on Drugs%26quot;?

loan



....cont.



Are you one of them by chance? Report It

|||Todays republicans are not the true republicans.|||looks as if you could land a job a NORML...go...|||You%26#039;ve got them all figured out. Good for you.



You left out the part about the evil Republicans and the CIA running the drug trade and making billions off of the misery of the poor minorities.|||I couldn%26#039;t agree more. And there is not much I could add to your thoughts...except that the decriminalization (note, not legalization) of marijuana would cut down the criminal statistics dramatically. This would be a very good first step. That, and the government getting their priorities straight...and focussing their attentions on issues that are important to the country, and winnable!|||Actually just to add to this. If that is their mission in which they claim it is, why do they avoid talking about it? Maybe because under this administration they have added something near 200,000 govt. jobs since Buttwipe took office. Seems kind of backwards huh.|||If you can%26#039;t see why preventing the flow of illegal drugs into America is important, you need some serious help.|||Also, they pretend to want to keep %26quot;big brother%26quot; out of America, yet see no problem with our army standing behind the Iraqi government and pointing a gun at the population.|||That is another interesting paradox of the supposed get rich republicans. If they wanted to get rich, they quit the war on drugs and tax them. Then they would have their friends import them for the fabulous profits.



And for Aslonas 鈥?you might think about what are the differences between republicans and conservatives.



%26quot;People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.%26quot;



- George Orwell|||You sound like you%26#039;re on drugs.|||Today%26#039;s republicans are more interested in the government regulating morality than they are about them upholding the Constitution of the United States of America.|||Because the GOP has too many fianancial ties to the drug industry to REALLY care about our kids more than money!|||The %26quot;War on Drugs%26quot; is just propaganda for show. There is no war it%26#039;s for appearences only. If they really wanted to get rid of drugs in the US they would have already.



I believe the government keeps illegal drugs in the market because honestly it controls Americans. It keeps people satiated and content. Imagine what it would be like if alcohol was suddenly banned? If it%26#039;s a violent place now, it we would be 100 times more so. Same reason cigarettes are not banned even though it%26#039;s proven harmful to your health.|||This is a very good question, but the dilemma is that most street drugs cause such things as paranoia and extreme anger and these lead very easily to violent behavior. And the truth is that most violent crimes, statistically, are performed by people who are on these street drugs at the time. So your question almost answers itself. I will say, though, I believe the government contributes to the drug problem in this country because there%26#039;s no way they can%26#039;t stop these illegal drugs from coming into our country - just no way. So, in the end, the whole thing, as you said, really does just perpetuate itself, doesn%26#039;t it?|||Their claims about a small government are purely propaganda...totally false......



Under the current administration, the size of the government in both number of people working, as well as expenditures, have risen to their highest levels in the history of the republic.



Dont be fooled.......|||The only difference between republicans and democrats is that I detest democrats more than I detest republicans.



I am a constitutional conservative and I DON%26#039;T support big government or the stupid war on drugs.



I consider both democrat and republicans to be looking out for what is best for them politically. Give a government money and power they shouldn%26#039;t have in the first place and you%26#039;ll rarely get it back.



The government, republican and democrat both are OUT OF CONTROL and we need a CLEAN SWEEP of the entire government to get rid of these career politicians that form the political class and are out for their own interests, NOT what is right and good for the country.|||The %26quot;small government%26quot; claim is just propoganda. Over the last 5 years the United States government has mushroomed in size and accumulated 3 TRILLION dollars of debt. All of this while under GOP control.



The GOP has always attacked Democrats and %26quot;Tax and Spend%26quot; but the story they won%26#039;t tell everyone is that the Republicans %26quot;BORROW and SPEND MORE%26quot;.



It will finally come to a nasty conclusion in 2020 when 33% of the US budget will be to pay interest on the DEBT !!! Wait until you see what the taxes will have to grow to in order to keep enverything else funded.



The only thing small about the GOP government is the long term planning.|||You are talking about a major, life-threatening epidemic in this counry! Small government or big government needs to step in for the safety issues. What in hell would this world be like w/ 1/2 the population stoned or high and putting their lives as well as innocent lives in constant danger? We have enough degenerates running loose as is and there are times when government mandates are necessary.|||I believe that the so called war on drugs is a farce. If you want to find the truth about why drugs, especially certain ones, are illegal, follow the money. What industries, for example, benefit the most from the fact that marijuana is illegal? If you want to learn the truth about most anything, the same thing applies...follow the money. Whoever has the most to gain, in terms of profit, is most likely behind whatever you are asking about! *sm*|||First, you%26#039;re statistics about 50% of jailed offenders in prison for drug offenses is inaccurate. The majority of those incarcerated for drug related offenses are for the sale and distribution of drugs!



Second, it is not the US government alone that provides for law making marijuana and THC illegal.



The United States with its International Treaties and agreements relate the following:



The Congressional findings in 21 U.S.C. 搂 801(7), 21 U.S.C. 搂 801(a)(2), and Template:21 state that a major purpose of the CSA is to %26quot;enable the United States to meet all of its obligations%26quot; under international treaties - specifically, the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs and the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances. The CSA bears many resemblances to these Conventions. Both the CSA and the treaties set out a system for classifying controlled substances in several Schedules in accordance with the binding scientific and medical findings of a public health authority. Under 21 U.S.C. 搂 811 of the CSA, that authority is the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). Under Article 3 of the Single Convention and Article 2 of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, the World Health Organization is that authority.



A provision for automatic compliance with treaty obligations is found at 21 U.S.C. 搂 811(d), which also establishes mechanisms for amending international drug control regulations to correspond with HHS findings on scientific and medical issues.



Unfortunately, many young drivers don%26#039;t understand the risks associated with marijuana use. Approximately one in six (15%) teens reported driving under the influence of marijuana, a number nearly equivalent to those who reported driving under the influence of alcohol (16%), despite higher prevalence of alcohol consumption among teens.



Research shows that smoking pot affects concentration, perception, coordination and reaction time, many of the skills required for safe driving.



In 2001, an approximately 38,000 high school seniors in the U.S. crashed while driving under the influence of marijuana and 46,000 crashed after driving under the influence of alcohol.



This response is NOT to make judgement against anybody...but to provide facts from reliable sources and not from teenage friends. There is no mistake that marijuana COULD be used responsibly just as drinking alcohol.



The problem lies with those who drink/drug and drive (in my own opinion). Additionally, my opinion is that until our government, based upon the majority vote, decides to rescind those international treaties and sway the medical authorities to change their opinion of marijuana, it will stay classified as a Schedule I drug!



Best wishes!|||The %26quot;small government%26quot; rhetoric of Republicans has been aimed primarily at the topic of ECONOMIC regulations. Historically, the federal government%26#039;s most important priorities have been to ensure a healthy, growing national economy and to ensure national security. Drug regulation was traditionally understood as being a subject regulable by the states.



The federal-jurisdiction/state-jurisdiction dichotomy has been signifigantly blurred during the 20th century. The federal government has been taking on an increasing sense of responsibility to %26quot;fight crime%26quot; and to nationalize issues which were previously at the discretion of the states instead. Much of the reason for this has been because of the Supreme Court%26#039;s interpretations of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.



I am not interested in addressing your belief that drugs are used by non-violent persons and are less dangerous than murderers, child molesters, and rapists. I am only trying to respond to the issue of why the Republicans seem to have abandoned their belief in %26quot;small government.%26quot;|||There is no war on drugs. To much money is being made from drugs. The police department make money from seize property, lawyers make money from the arrest, Rich people get rich by up fronting money to dealers,politician skimming money from programs and making jobs for friends, etc.



If they wanted to stop cocaine from coming to the US, if would be cheaper to buy all the coca leaves in South America and burn them.

Why are so many people EMPLOYED in this BUSH Economy?

Our economy has created 1.6 million jobs in the last 12 months, and 8.22 million since August 2003 when the labor market began its turnaround. Private employment increased by 24,000 jobs in August, marking the 48th consecutive month of private job growth. The unemployment rate remained VERY VERY low at 4.6 percent, below the average of each of the past four decades!



Thanks GWB!



Why are so many people EMPLOYED in this BUSH Economy?





That%26#039;s what happens when you cut taxes and give people a hand up instead of a typical Democrat handout.



Why are so many people EMPLOYED in this BUSH Economy? loan



Heh, it%26#039;s easy when you blow up the national debt. No magic, there.



.|||Because most of them are hookers like you.|||The Reagan said government needs to get out of the way.



I got my good paying job with good benefits cause I went to college and busted my @ss.



Republicans shouldn%26#039;t take credit for my job! Neither the democrats|||your pulling my leg|||OMG 4000 jobs were cut last month.



The FIRST time in 48 months where that%26#039;s occurred. It must be a record!



As soon as fall hits and the next three major Holiday%26#039;s... I%26#039;m predicting 20,000 more jobs.



Per the libs though, %26quot;The sky is falling!%26quot;|||Because wages are lower than ever and people are working more for less money.



It%26#039;s all the competition from China.



Soon we will have full employment because we will all be serfs - unless we get some pro-Middle Class government back.



http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/9...|||This isn%26#039;t a Bush economy. It%26#039;s a congressional and Federal Reserve economy. It always has been. Bush will just take credit for it.|||The backbone of the US economy has been the auto industry. And the unemployment/jobloss rates for the auto industry alone are at the highest levels in their entire history.



Michigan , the auto capital, used to lead the nation is lowest number of unemployed. Now they are one of the highest in unemployed.



The unemployment rate has gone up since Bush has been in office. And this is coming from someone who twice voted for the moron.|||Most jobs %26quot;created%26quot; pay less than the ones that were eliminated. At least you admit that it%26#039;s thanks to George The Psychopathic Incompetent.|||Source?



http://www.economagic.com/em-cgi/data.ex...



According to my source, the overall unemployment when Bush took office was 3.9%.



Now, it%26#039;s 4.6%.



By way of comparison, when Clinton took office, the rate was 7.3%. It dropped to 3.9% by the time he left. I wouldn%26#039;t say that Bush has done wonders for employment. It looks like he kept it about the same. Fortunately, he didn%26#039;t have much work to do...thanks to Clinton.|||Because he%26#039;s failed to secure our borders?|||Yeah and how is that sub prime economy working for ya ?



Kind of like the Bush administration, all shiney and bright on the outside, but on closer examination, its all smoke and mirrors. You have any idea how much we have BORROWED from China to pay for Bush%26#039;s war?



Your grand kids, grand kids will still be paying for it.



Meanwhile all indications are we are headed into a recession.



Thanks GWB.|||The truth is in the details. Many of these jobs are part time, don%26#039;t offer affordable health insurance or benefits and many don%26#039;t pay like those that have been outsourced, that%26#039;s why they were outsourced. Our imports outweigh our exports. Exports= good paying manufacturing jobs, of which we have lost millions. Taking things at face value can be dangerous!|||you really need a new avtar miss.|||Penelope-the United States lost 4.000 jobs in August,when it was expected to increase by 100,000 and has increased economists worries that the economy is headed for recession



Exactly what fantasy land do you live in?|||Your numbers are actually kind of questionable. The unemployment rate does not necessarily reflect the actual employment rank. It does not reflect the high numbers of workers in minimun wage positions either. It is not enough to cite numbers of jobs created. You need also to show the types of jobs that have been created. Unemployment figures do not count people that do not reecieve unemplyment, but mat actually be unemployed, such as those on welfare and homeless people that recieve no aid at all.|||Because a 150 thousand soldier are sent off to Iraq and another million jobs to create supplies for the war have been created in the US to support the war.



The current economy is only because the current government is directly overspending.|||The GREAT SERVICE SECTOR!!!



Thanks President Bush!|||Please tell that to the 4000 who lost their jobs.



Please tell that to the 12,000 about to lose their jobs with Countrywide.



Please tell that to the 400,000 who lose their jobs every year to China.



Please tell that to the several hundred people who showed up at Wal-mart who only had openings for 65.|||All those supposed jobs are probably government jobs. As you know, Bush has done a excellent job doubleling the size of government. They are always hiring at the police departments, Blackwater USA, Armed Forces, etc.



But as for private sector jobs, you have got to be joking!



Now, since you are capable of research, then I suggest you research how many times congress had to raise the debt ceiling under Bush. And while you are at it, look into how much we are spending and how much we are taking in with revenue. If you just balance a simple check book, you will finally take your head out of the sand and notice that the jobs are going bye bye. In short, we are spending ourselves to death.|||Again, honey, most the %26quot;jobs%26quot; you speak of are not high-paying, mortgage-affording jobs, so stop crowing about it, OK?|||You are right we need a change, there are to many people working, and that economy has to be shut down. We also need to bring our troops home......This add brought to you by Hillary in%26#039;08



G.I. where have you been, our national debt is half of what it was when Bush took over......as you are aware, the %26quot;surplus%26quot; under Clinton was a theoretical one, that never existed. The %26quot;Bush %26quot;tax cuts%26quot; have almost tripled the federal tax revenue. If every thing keeps on the way it is going now, by the time that Bush leaves office, the deficit will be the smallest in the past 75 years.|||GI.... the National Debt drives employment???? How, please explain that to me.



I think it%26#039;s hilarious that the libs still complain about how horrible the economy is.



Consumer confidence is at an all time high, unemployment is lower now than when the liberal savior was in office. Inflation is in check....



I don%26#039;t get liberal... I guess they just like to complain whether the complaints are valid or not.



Buy Carbon Credits!!!!

Small business vs Big business?

A town council meets. The unemployment rate is the same as the national average. It%26#039;s a somewhat small town (pop%26lt;10000) and the economy is stable, though not milk and honey. I%26#039;m not sure if this is exactly how it happens, but play along.



A large retail chain wishes to build a store in the town. Doing so will ruin many local small businesses (Walmart vs Wilma%26#039;s apparel). Some will have to shut down and others will have to fire workers. But, the new store will offer slightly more jobs than those fired.



Should they be allowed to do so? At the cost of local culture?



Small business vs Big business?loan





Here%26#039;s the difference.



When the mom %26amp; pop stores operate, all the profits of the business stay in the community. The mom %26amp; pop owners spend their incomes within the community. There is an economic balance.



Wal mart moves in and takes the customer base and crates a few more low income jobs for the community. The profits of the store, however, go back to corporate heaquarters. The end result is less wealth in the community. This fact is disguised by more low income jobs. But all the profits for the goods the people in the town buy leave the community. Wealth is slowly drained.



Now, you tell me if it should be allowed?



Small business vs Big business?

loan



Economics question, not political question.



Home %26gt; Social Science %26gt; Economics|||Depends on if the local business employees are on medicaid or not, because they will be as Walmart employees.

1970 economy?

What was the United States GDP, violent crime level, unemployment rate, and national debt in the 1970s?



1970 economy?payday loan





Please consult the Statitical Abstract that will give most of the information you are looking for. Published since 1878, is the authoritative and comprehensive summary of statistics on the social, political, and economic organization of the United States.



Use the Abstract as a convenient volume for statistical reference, and as a guide to sources of more information both in print and on the Web. Sources of data include the Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, and many other Federal agencies and private organizations



http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/

A serious questions for Democrats?

I have been wondering if any of you out there can explain to me why the democratic runners in Thursdays debate could only talk about the war, IE: everything contrary to present, yet they had nothing to say about changing the Great economy and low unemployment rate; furthermore, have any of you seen the Dow. Over 13,000. Prosperous times like these NEVER happened under a democrat. So, to my original question. Please educate me on the fact that the candidates had nothing to say about that, and are more concerned about raising the white flag and giving terrorist a clear victory, which would put our country in great danger.



Thanks.



Just curious



A serious questions for Democrats?auto loan





I am not a democrat but if you would indulge me I would like to offer a thought.



As a person of wisdom (that means getting a bit older), I have watched these two parties a lot of years and have learned quite a bit by this observation. Pretty much since Vietnam, the democrats have nothing to offer, they were great before, helping victims of society, they did so well there are no more victims, but the dems failed to change and are still stuck in the 60%26#039;s, so it is always about victims. They have now taken a great leap and gone from helping victims to trying to force socialism on AMerica.



They have no new ideas (ie not liberals), they can only criticize and never offer any real solution other than increase government in size, cost and control of your lives.



This is not something Americans want.



In the last election voters said we believe the current majority are showing a bit of corruption, so lets give the other side a try. What you have seen since are witch hunts and hate bush, nothing has come of it, except of course a lot of corruption, ie reid land deal, pelosi tuna deal, feinstein milking her committee position for millions, and that is just the tip of the iceberg.



I forgot to add, the answers you get will clearly show that there is no vision other than socialist utopia madness and hate bush and hate the war, it is all they can say.



A serious questions for Democrats?

loan



Their not going to touch this one|||Well I will be as honest with you as possible. The only real headway that the democratic party knows it has regardless of the position of the individual candidate is the war. It is their only chance, and thats fair enough. Lemme just go off topic for a second, honestly the debate was boring as hell and I left halfway through it. After reading some of MSNBC.com%26#039;s suggested Do%26#039;s and Don%26#039;ts I was kind of hoping the individual candidates would do exactly what MSNBC told them not to do. It would%26#039;ve made for a much more interesting debate.|||Well first, we had low unemployment and high stock prices all through Clinton%26#039;s two terms, and low inflation, and a budget surplus on top of that...



So your proposition that %26quot;these have NEVER happened under a dem%26quot; is complete bullsh*t...



Also, I invite you to go down to your grocery store and see how much food they%26#039;ll hand over just because the stock market went up today.



I think you%26#039;ll find they still require cash.



Much of the so called %26quot;prosperity%26quot; of recent times has been built on corporate policies involving the outsourcing of American jobs overseas. A great many people in this country have seen their jobs disappear, their incomes stagnate. This has been going on since 1980 or so.



The lower and middle classes have not been benefiting from this %26quot;prosperity,%26quot; they have been caused to sacrifice in the name of it.



%26quot;Prosperity%26quot; that is only of any practical use to the privileged minority that controls the private economy, isn%26#039;t %26quot;prosperity%26quot; at all.



However, the war is clearly the more pressing issue. It is grossly more expensive than any of its proponents ever dared suggest it was going to be, there is no evidence any of them has the slightest idea how to resolve it, or that it is doing a single thing to ameliorate the threat of random terrorism (in fact it may very well be doing the opposite), it is tying up the bulk of our military resources, again with no prospect of any resolution, and it is contributing to the highest budget deficits the govt has ever incurred.



It is a textbook case of an incompetently undertaken military adventure.



There is absolutely no reason to suppose any terrorist is being stopped from coming to America to do his business because of it.



Your insistence that it%26#039;s somehow vital to the nation to keep up this farce is laughable, contemptible and disgusting.



Seriously, could you fools possibly be a more pusillanimous



flock of chickensh*ts? I doubt it.|||It%26#039;s simple. Iraq is the main issue on about 80% of Americans minds right now. Gee|||I%26#039;m a democrat. This argument has various forms, the most common of which is, %26quot;Why is the police officer arresting me?! Why aren%26#039;t they after a serious criminal like a murderer?!%26quot;



I agree with the facts. I am NOT a liberal or socialist, and face both down constantly. My family is formerly Islamic (in the 1950s) and we expected this war a long time ago, President Bush just jumped in earlier than Islam expected or was ready for.



Why would the leaders of my party address this issue? It serves no purpose for them. Second, there is no reason to let go of the war issue to discuss Republican successes.



Does that make sense? I%26#039;m not talking about what is right or wrong here, just the reasoning.



I%26#039;m a patriot, first, and a democrat, second.



Keep speaking up.|||I think its because the Republican/ Bush war is the most glaringly distracting problem faced by this nation. Can you tell me why Bush had to ever have this war in the first place and why, as intelligent as some Republicans seemed to be at the time, they allowed it to happen?



We have hundreds of thousands killed for no apparent justification and no end in sight.



Bush%26#039;s war is not supported by most of the American people and Bush and his Republican supporters need to be held accountable - forget the attacks on civil liberties, the Constitution, the balance of powers, the poor record on the environment, disastrous foreign relations, venal criminality and corruption, attacks on the separation between church and state and the well fare for the rich with the Bush tax cuts....lets hammer this war issue some more. You guys started it and ran the game for 6 years.



Now the chickens are coming home to roost.|||This great economy you see is not much in evidence here in the nation%26#039;s capital.



We have several friends who are professionals, who have worked for a decade or more, and who have been out of work for a year or more. Immigrants are doing their work.



Our friends with 20 years experience in construction hobble along on side jobs, while all the salaried jobs have gone to the immigrants.



Our friends in the mortgage industry are going bankrupt, and no one is doing their jobs.



The Dow only reflects rich people%26#039;s optimism about how they will do in the future - and with the dems voting to end this damnable war, things are looking better. That%26#039;s all the Dow reflects.



As far as the debate last night, was it on the war? rather than domestic topics? I can see there was a moderator asking questions.



In addition, what is more important that the US using its might and wealth to torture, sometime to death, innocent Iraqis, and to murder 100,000 or more iraqis in an attempt to liberate them. There is no other topic to debate, really, as long as we are engaged in mass murder and the incitement of civil unrest at the behest of the lying, thieving, gangster in the white house.

Unemlployment?

suppose the government hires workers that are currently unemployed, but does not give them any work to do, what will happen to the unemployment rate? Is this an accurant refelection of the economic situation



Unemlployment?car loan





I don%26#039;t believe it is an accurate reflection of the unemployment rate even if they do what you are suggesting. They base their totals on people who are receiving unemployment payments; there are a lot of people who are unemployed but don%26#039;t receive payment. They don%26#039;t either out of choice or don%26#039;t because they have exhausted their unemployment compensation.



Unemlployment? loan



If you recieve benefits, without having to work, you show up as %26quot;unemployed%26quot;. However if you are sexually harassed into quitting by an employer as I was, they don%26#039;t pay you any unemployment, and there are a great many %26quot;uncounted%26quot; people, neither employed or recieving benefits trying to survive anyway they can. Yes they still pay taxes, everything you buy has taxes involved. And if you are not on unemployment you have less chances of getting hired by the government or agencies that are rewarded for hiring the unemployed.

Is the stock market at all time highs the damage that Bush has done?

Is the record low unemployment rate the damage that Bush has done? Are the low taxes the damage that Bush has done? Protecting this country from terror, is that the damage that Bush has done?



Is the stock market at all time highs the damage that Bush has done?apply for a loan





Keep telling yourself that... It will all be over soon and you can go back to bashing Democrats.



Is the stock market at all time highs the damage that Bush has done? loan



he%26#039;s damage the economy by lowering taxes during war time.lowering taxes and increasing spending by billions has done damage to the economy.



u can%26#039;t keep spending money u don%26#039;t take in,thats not elementary economics,thats just called don%26#039;t be mc hammer|||lol



the new jobs he created pay much less



corporate profits are at an all time high while poverty goes thru the roof



real per capita income has dropped on all levels except for the ultra rich



incurance companies letting their %26quot;valued costumers%26quot; die while their stock go thru the roof



bush is great|||You%26#039;re asking way too many questions for the liberals. Give them time to think. Be patient, it%26#039;s going to take them some time to dream up some %26quot;facts%26quot; about the damage he%26#039;s done.|||The stock market was at all time highs before 1929 as well. Then look what happened. Due to RepubliCON mismanagement of the economy and deregulation of business, the economy was plunged into a depression.



Low unemployment on its face looks great. But when you look and see that strong middle class jobs are being lost and being replaced with minimum wage jobs, then the statistic becomes meaningless.



Low taxes? For who? Everyone I know is still paying the same rate.



Protecting the country from terror? I guess September 11th wasn%26#039;t anything worth noting. Terror attacks where terrorists are able to reach their targets due to geographic proximity are occurring in record numbers.



Yeah, great job.|||Is the stock market the economy?



Are unemployment rates realistic?



Is the American middle class disappearing?



Are we in the middle of the most volatile region in the world, due to lies and deceit?



I love ya though!!!!!!Smooch!!!!!!!!! Happy New Year!!!!!|||Stock market shaky at best. But what has he done to keep it up? China bought 9% of Smith Barney. That%26#039;s good now they own the bank.



4.5% is not a historic low. It is called target unemployment. And exactly is %26quot;seasonal adjustment%26quot; Is that like %26quot;Finagle%26#039;s Constant?%26quot;



Burgeoning current budget deficits while giving the richest 5% of Americans huge tax breaks? Warren Buffett declared that it is idiocy that he pays less taxes than his secretary. Oh yeah, he%26#039;s the president of Berkshire-Hathaway Corp.



Suspension of Habeus Corpus- the underpinning of American criminal and constitutional law. Sponsoring torture, and denying detainees their rights under the 15th and 16th ammendmants to the constitution?



Why just focus on bogus economic issues?|||The stock market is a symtom of the overall economy. It is still doing well because the rich are doing well. Unemployment is false. When you drop off unemployment whether or not you have a job you%26#039;re not counted anymore. Also people who have lost their jobs have had to take a job where they earn a lot less. I don%26#039;t know about you but the tax cuts didn%26#039;t help me. They only helped the top few percent. As far as terrorism is concerned Bush%26#039;s policies have only hurt us. Please re-think your positions and stop defending the people who are destroying America%26#039;s way of life. LIke building and supporting a middle class, honesty and fairness, and respect throughout the world|||Who benefited most from the high stock market, Bush, Cheney, their rich cronies and corporate America..Who benefited most form the low taxes for the rich ?...Bush, Cheney and corporate America..What low employment ?...You mean low paying employment don%26#039;t you...What protection ?.....I believe 911 happen on Bush%26#039;s watch so did 20 million illegal immigrants of which God only knows how many terrorist marched across the border amongst the many millions......Bush has done great damage to America indeed !!!|||For all you people that think Bush is doing a bad job, move to Iran, Russia, Africa, etc... and then tell me how bad our economy is and the way we do things. If it wasn%26#039;t for all the bad things that everyone said we do, you wouldn%26#039;t be on a computer griping about our government.Why?? You couldn%26#039;t afford it!!!!!!!|||the Great Depression was not a failure of the free market



according to Milton Friedman, it was poor Federal Reserve management (by the way, the Federal Reserve was created by Wilson, a Democrat)



the Feds let the money supply shrink by 1/3 from 1930 to 1931



FDR made it last a very long time by implementing social policies (Mussolini praised them) that slowed business and took money away from the people who created jobs (poor people don%26#039;t create jobs)



imagine the media reports if the economy collapsed, and George Bush destroyed massive amounts of food while people starved

Life In the London Borough of Newham - is it good or bad? Should the Mayor resign?

The UK Governments own statistics on crime, health, employment, environment and education show that Newham in London is the worst place to live. The Mayor, Robin Wales has said the figures are %26quot;complete and utter rubbish%26quot;



He would wouldnt he? Do you think Newham is good place to live? If you dont live in Newham, would you consider moving here to a place were 5 under 21%26#039;s have been murdered on the street this year, where you are more likely to be mugged, trip over bad paving stones, schools that underperform and where the unemployment rate of over 17% is almost five times higher than the national average?



Do you think the Mayor of Newham should resign?



Life In the London Borough of Newham - is it good or bad? Should the Mayor resign?bad credit loan





Yes i do along with Ken Livingstone

As a new immigrant to USA ,which state or states is suitable for living?

Low unemployment rate, Low rent cost , kind people are important factors .



As a new immigrant to USA ,which state or states is suitable for living?business loan





If you are here legally, welcome!



Everyone wants what you want, so I would suggest that you start with an area where the climate is closer to where you came from. You will adapt easier. Likely the people around you will enjoy a lot of the same things you do so that you can make new friends with similar interests.



As to finding a job, the American people are quickly losing their jobs because the government has allowed everything to be exported - including their jobs. You are obviously educated, so look for an area with similar occupations available. You obviously are computer literate, so look in the newspapers online. You don%26#039;t need guidance in that area.



The most important thing that you can do to help yourself is to spread the word that you are a legal immigrant (if this is true) so that people can appreciate someone taking the legal steps that we are asking all immigrants to do.



If you know of any illegal immigrants, you need to report them if you are indeed trying to become a US citizen. You will be respected in the US for this. Illegal aliens give legal immigrants a bad name.



I don%26#039;t know if I believe that you are an immigrant - maybe a politician fishing for responses???



As a new immigrant to USA ,which state or states is suitable for living?

loan



how about mexico? hear it is really nice this time of year.|||Canada looks good!|||Stay away from New Jersey, its expensive, high taxes, tough cops and snubby neighbors.



good schools though i hear|||Not California. It has one item that immigrants like. We have a lot of immigrant community that a new immigrant can hide. Most of Californias rent is high, and we do have a lot of low income jobs available. I suggest you first start looking where your fellow country men immigrated too. Its a lot easier to find food and friends. I did hear good things about minnesota though.|||kind people are everywhere. just be nice and they will be nice back. as my sister says, god don%26#039;t like ugly. every state here is livable.|||Land is cheap in Siberia! Don%26#039;t forget your coat!|||Any state is suitable. The question is what part of the state and your income.|||well you do speak english well enough. What type of immigrant are you? where are you from? what are your skills? do you have family? if you are mexican .. go back to mexico|||~Washington, DC~|||How about Mexico%26#039;...andale|||ask ICE|||hummmmmmmmmm how about Mexico!! yeah that would probably suit ya!!!|||Probably shouldn%26#039;t go to a state where some of the sarcastic answers come from. There are good states, all of them and if you%26#039;re legally here (as is my wife!) - WELCOME!|||Illinois is very nice, but the closer you get to Chicago the more expensive it is. Hopefully you are legal, right?|||from reading some of the answers given to you ... it sounds like you might have a better chance in your own country.... the mentality of some of these people will give you a insight as to how the people are really going to treat you.|||well there are alot of states that are suitable for living, Illinois is starting to push laws to help legal immigrants. people answering your question should not be so ignorant,it seems like you want a better life, these others should not be so rude but that is our new America...... full of jerks!!!!!! NO I am not a immigrant I was born in the states and so were my parents!!!! If you are here legally I am pretty sure you will do fine were ever you go...Good Luck|||Illinois is pretty decent and welcoming.



Certainly not where some of these people answered you from!!!



i never understood close minded people...|||Legal immigrant to this country are welcomed everywhere. Most of us are descendants of immigrants. Illegal immigrants who are here to do jobs that Americans don%26#039;t want to do, should join the Army in Iraq.|||I%26#039;ll tell you this.. best California (north part) but.. expensive|||Old Mexico (Texas,California,Arizona,etc, for starters)



And really all of the southern,western states!

Have you thanked our two term President lately?

For keeping us safe: No terror attacks on USA soil since 9/11



Economy: 9 Million well paying jobs created since 2003. A very Low 4.6% unemployment rate!



Restoring Honor %26amp; Dignity back to the White House after the impeached Clinton.



Have you thanked our two term President lately?loan rates





AMEN!!! Thank you President Bush!!



Have you thanked our two term President lately? loan



Yes, my kids and grandkids will thank him once they see the bill for the Iraq war.



EDIT: Rich people are also the biggest beneficiaries of taxes, since many of them get huge subsidies for their businesses and many of them also benefit from the government%26#039;s sale of public lands and resources (especially during the current administration). You shouldn%26#039;t assume that because someone criticizes the Bush administration, that automatically makes them a liberal. By the way, this deficit should have you worried, unless of course, you are not a real conservative.



Troll!|||Its easy to have money when you borrow, a truely strong economy is built on productivity.|||Yes. I am very proud of our president and am going to be sad to see him go.



I love the way he looks at Laura, it shows want kind of man he is.|||%26quot;no terrorists attacks on USA soil since 9/11%26quot;



it%26#039;s not like terrorists attacks on the country were an everyday occurence before 9/11...how many times do i have to tell you this.



as for the economy, the government is about 1 tril dollars in debt. a low unemployment rate doesn%26#039;t necessarily constitute a good economy|||George W. Bush is America%26#039;s all-time worst 2 term president. I%26#039;m starting to question your sanity, if you think that President Bush has done a good job in his time in office. You obviously aren%26#039;t a common sense type of conservative.|||I am thankful everyday that we are safe, and that no scandals have been implicated in the White House.|||Hahahahahaa,Good one, hahahaha you%26#039;re funny, Hahahahaa..Keep %26#039;em coming...|||Nope but i have thanks the Lord that its almost over. He really doesn%26#039;t do a thing for me so i have not reason to thank him. Maybe is he passed me the salt at dinner or something but no I have had not reason to thank him.



Hey lets not knock starbucks now I like there coffee.|||no terror attacks since 911? anthrax?|||Thank him for what?



For the near $9 trillion dollar national debt and the huge trade deficits we have now?



For the US dollar now being weaker than the Canadaian dollar?



For his promises to veto a children%26#039;s healthcare bill?



For his runaway spending habits?



For the endless scandals coming from his inner circle and his party?



For his increasing of the power and size of the federal government while attepmting to take away states%26#039; rights?



For using the non-existent threat of Saddam Hussein%26#039;s non-existent mushroom cloud to scare us into suppporting his war?



For promoting amnesty for illegal immigrants?



No, I don%26#039;t see myself thanking him anytime soon.



Honor and diginty my achin%26#039; ***!|||Well first no there have not been any terrorist attacks since 9/11 but I consider that luck. We need to bump up our security A LOT more because there is definitely a problem when anyone who wants to can just cross our borders. If people think the war in Iraq is keeping us safe well...it isn%26#039;t. Second, people%26#039;s jobs are STILL being sent to China and Clinton managed to keep the unemployment rate low his entire presidency, Bush just got it back down after 7 years in office. Third what honor and dignity? What about Bush lying to Congress about Iraq, pardoned his personal friend Scooter Libby who committed a serious crime, his cabinet is corrupt, Alberto Gonzales scandal and Bush lies to America time after time.|||Dictator Dumbya was NEVER elected. He should be %26quot;thanked%26quot; with a life sentence in a super max, no parole.|||Oh thanks for reminding me!



Mr. President, thanks for all you have done for this great nation. One last favor if you don%26#039;t mind? accept Cheney%26#039;s resignation, then resign. go fishing or out to lunch or some thing? and please stay away from politics,Thank u sir.



Edit: 9 Mil, good paying job since 2003? 2003? 2003?remember now not 2000? but 2003?



well, i guess we are going to have a long line of people applying for unemployment soon? low 4.6% unemp. rate? well hell.....?



Restoring honor and lablala? far out dudes?



btw: do you work for the company?